The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) indicated late on Monday, after a three-hour meeting with Iran, that more work was needed by the country in order to fully implement a series of nuclear transparency steps by a Thursday deadline.
The IAEA also made clear that no agreement had yet been reached with Iran on what issues to tackle in the next phase of a cooperation pact aimed at allaying fears that Tehran may be seeking to develop a nuclear weapons capability.
The outcome is likely to disappoint Western diplomats, who want Iran to move much faster in addressing the IAEA’s questions about alleged activities that could be relevant for any bid to build a nuclear missile. Iran denies any such work.
“Everybody is fairly frustrated at the lack of progress,” said one envoy who closely follows the Iran nuclear file.
The meeting took place a day before Iran and six world powers were due to start a new round of negotiations, also in the Austrian capital, aimed at reaching a final settlement of the standoff over Tehran’s nuclear ambitions by late July.
Iran has offered to work with the IAEA in clarifying what the UN agency calls the possible military dimensions (PMD) of the country’s nuclear program. But diplomats and experts say it would be difficult for Iran to admit to any past activity contradicting its denials of allegations of a bomb agenda.
“Iran has real problems in addressing the PMD issues,” said the Western diplomat, who is not from one of the six major powers negotiating with Iran—the United States, France, Germany, Britain, China and Russia.
There was no immediate comment from Tehran.
Iran’s talks with the IAEA and with the powers are closely linked as both focus on fears that Iran may be covertly seeking a nuclear weapons capability. Iran says its uranium enrichment program is a peaceful energy project only.
Western diplomats say Iran must start engaging with the IAEA’s long-stalled investigation and that this is central to the success of the broader negotiations.
Under the cooperation agreement signed with the IAEA in November, Iran was to take seven practical measures by May 15 in a phased process to shed more light on its atomic activities.
Diplomatic sources told Reuters last Friday that the IAEA was seeking further clarification from Iran about the most sensitive of those steps, concerning fast-acting detonators that can have both military and civilian applications.
How Iran responds to questions about its development and need of this type of equipment is seen as an important test of its willingness to cooperate fully with the IAEA investigation.
Iran says it has already implemented the seven steps—including access to two uranium sites—but the sources said the IAEA still wanted more information about so-called Explosive Bridge Wire (EBW) detonators.
They said the IAEA also wanted to agree with Iran new measures to be taken after May 15, hoping these will address other sensitive issues linked to its nuclear bomb inquiry.
However, after Monday’s apparently inconclusive meeting, the two sides did not even say when they would meet again.
Iran wants an end to sanctions that are badly hurting its oil-reliant economy. After years of a vitriolic and confrontational standoff with the West, the election last year of pragmatist Hassan Rouhani as Iran’s president created a new atmosphere more conducive to settling disputes via diplomacy.
But diplomats and experts say Iran and the West remain far apart on what a long-term deal to resolve the dispute and dispel fears of a new Middle East war would look like.
“It’s typical for negotiations to experience bumps, blocks and breakdowns,” said Mark Fitzpatrick of the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) think-tank.
In the Iran-IAEA talks, “the Iranian negotiators have to be wary of appearing to be too cooperative, lest they be accused back home of giving in,” Fitzpatrick said.