Middle-east Arab News Opinion | Asharq Al-awsat

Afghan vote in the balance, Abdullah cancels trip - ASHARQ AL-AWSAT English Archive
Select Page
In this Oct. 26, 2009 picture, Abdullah Abdullah former Afghan foreign minister who ran against President Hamid Karzai in August's vote, gives a news conference in Kabul, Afghanistan (AP)

In this Oct. 26, 2009 picture, Abdullah Abdullah former Afghan foreign minister who ran against President Hamid Karzai in August’s vote, gives a news conference in Kabul, Afghanistan (AP)

KABUL, (Reuters) – Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s election rival Abdullah Abdullah cancelled a planned trip to India on Saturday, his advisers said, heightening speculation he would pull out of next week’s disputed run-off vote.

Afghanistan has been racked by weeks of political uncertainty after widespread fraud marred the first round, with security another major concern after a resurgent Taliban vowed to disrupt the Nov. 7 run-off vote.

With Afghanistan’s political future hanging in the balance, U.S. President Barack Obama is also weighing whether to send thousands more troops to Afghanistan. Obama met U.S. military leaders in Washington on Friday as part of a strategy review.

Abdullah, Karzai’s former foreign minister, had been due to leave for India on Saturday. He had also given Karzai a deadline of Saturday to sack Afghanistan’s top election official. Aides said he would likely hold a media conference in Kabul on Sunday. “He is staying because of the election,” Abdullah’s spokesman Ali Farhad Howaida said. Other aides would not confirm or deny whether Abdullah would outline his plans at Sunday’s briefing. “He will give his opinion on the election,” said Fazel Sancharaki, another Abdullah spokesman. Western officials have pointed out that Abdullah has not opened any campaign offices in Afghanistan since the run-off was called last week. Neither candidate has campaigned openly. “The signs are there. (Abdullah’s) not doing any campaigning. Everyone is looking at the two camps and willing them to do some form of accommodation that will avoid a run-off,” one Western diplomat, who asked not to be identified, told Reuters.

Talk of a possible power-sharing deal between Karzai and Abdullah has also grown as a possible solution to the deadlock.

The U.S. embassy in Kabul said it was a matter for Karzai and Abdullah to decide if they could come up with a constitutionally sound solution that was acceptable to Afghans.

Western diplomats have said privately Abdullah may have overplayed his hand with last week’s ultimatum to Karzai, which included a demand to sack three ministers in a bid to avoid a repeat of the first-round fraud. Karzai has already indicated he would not give in to Abdullah’s demand. Abdullah has not said what he would do if the officials were not sacked.

Citing an unidentified Western source it said was close to the Afghan leadership, CNN reported on Friday that talks between Karzai and Abdullah had broken down and that Abdullah would likely pull out.

Neither Karzai nor Abdullah would comment on those meetings but behind-the-scenes diplomatic efforts to convince them to work together to break the deadlock increased this week.

Diplomats and analysts have said that, according to the constitution, it was possible the run-off might go ahead with

Karzai as the only candidate if Abdullah pulls out. They fear that would have a serious impact on the government’s legitimacy. “If Abdullah boycotts, voter turnout will be very low and Karzai will be declared winner but with a very low legitimacy,” said Haroun Mir, a Kabul-based analyst and director of Afghanistan’s Centre for Research and Policy Studies.

Speaking in Abu Dhabi, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said such a situation was not unprecedented. “I don’t think it has anything to do with the legitimacy of the election. It’s a personal choice which may or may not be made,” she said. The run-off was triggered when a U.N.-led fraud investigation found widespread fraud, mainly in favour of Karzai, had been committed during the Aug. 20 first round. The United States already has about 70,000 troops in Afghanistan and the decision to send more hinges on whether the Afghan government is seen by U.S. lawmakers and the public as a legitimate and viable partner.

Obama’s predecessor, George W. Bush, said Afghanistan faced a return to a “brutal tyranny” if the Taliban, al Qaeda and their militant Islamist allies were allowed to return to power. “The mission in Afghanistan has been long and difficult and costly, but I believe that it’s necessary for stability and peace,” Bush said at the leadership summit in New Delhi Abdullah had been due to attend.

Many commentators and Western diplomats believe Karzai will likely win the run-off, adding pressure on Abdullah to withdraw for the sake of stability. It would also avoid the mobilisation of thousands of foreign troops that would be needed to help secure polling stations after poor security and Taliban threats cut voter turnout in August.

Karzai’s support mainly comes from Pashtuns, Afghanistan’s largest ethnic group and the country’s traditional rulers, in the south and east where the Taliban-led insurgency is strongest.

The Taliban have called on Afghans to boycott the run-off and have vowed to disrupt the poll, their threat underlined on Wednesday by a suicide attack on a Kabul guest-house used by the United Nations in which five foreign U.N. staff were killed.

The fast-approaching onset of Afghanistan’s harsh winter and lingering concerns about fraud have further complicated efforts to organise the run-off.

Two Afghan men walk along a street in Herat October 31, 2009 (REUTERS)

Two Afghan men walk along a street in Herat October 31, 2009 (REUTERS)

An armed Afghan policeman stands alert at a campaign office of Afghan President Hamid Karzai in Kabul on October 30, 2009 (AFP)

An armed Afghan policeman stands alert at a campaign office of Afghan President Hamid Karzai in Kabul on October 30, 2009 (AFP)

Asharq Al-Awsat

Asharq Al-Awsat

Asharq Al-Awsat is the world’s premier pan-Arab daily newspaper, printed simultaneously each day on four continents in 14 cities. Launched in London in 1978, Asharq Al-Awsat has established itself as the decisive publication on pan-Arab and international affairs, offering its readers in-depth analysis and exclusive editorials, as well as the most comprehensive coverage of the entire Arab world.

More Posts

Follow Me:
FacebookGoogle PlusYouTube