Middle-east Arab News Opinion | Asharq Al-awsat

The Arab AIPAC - ASHARQ AL-AWSAT English Archive
Select Page

Even before the annual meeting of AIPAC in which American Presidential candidates submitted their credentials in emphasizing that Jerusalem must be the united capital of Israel, and during which they assured their commitment to the military superiority of Israel, so that it continues to occupy, kill and transfer Palestinians and Arabs, even before all this, Hussein Agha and Robert Malley wrote an important article in the New York Times on June 3, 2008 under the title “Peace Fills a Vacuum”, in which they discussed the eventual thawing of three crises in the Middle East, without virtually the help, or even the presence, of the United States. The writers referred to the Doha agreement regarding Lebanon, and to Egypt’s effort with regard to Gaza, and to the enunciation of the Israeli-Syrian peace negotiations sponsored by Turkey. The writers highlighted the point that: “That so many parties are moving at the same time in so many arenas is noteworthy enough. That they are doing so without- and, in some cases, despite- the United States is more remarkable still”. And they considered this a clear indication that: “Intent on isolating its foes, the United States has instead ended up marginalizing itself” They read major events in the Middle East as a proof of the degeneration of the credibility of the United States, and as a very strong cursor that “At a critical time in a critical region, [the United States] is quite simply missing in action”.

Soon after that, we all listened to American presidential candidates speaking in front of AIPAC and totally ignoring the Arabs and their rights, lands and future, and the next big item of the news in the Middle East was the so called security agreement between the United States and Iraq, which will ensure that Iraq remains under the thumb of the Americans for a hundred years to come. All these subsequent events prove that the Arabs have no place in the dictionary of American foreign policy. Rather, they further prove that American politicians are prepared to do whatever it takes in order to ensure that Israel has the upper hand in the region no matter how many and ugly crimes it perpetrates against the Arabs and their children.

A fresh reading of the above mentioned events in the region show, without a shadow of doubt, that the Arabs possess the essential factors of their own strength, and they are the only ones who can change the course of events in favor of their historic rights. That is to say the keys of their problems are in their own pockets, and not across the Atlantic. The other flip of Agha and Malley’s reading of the absence of the US is the beginning of a shy, but definite, emergence of an Arab Consciousness that they are the ones who can shape the future of their region. The convening of the ordinary Arab Summit in Damascus and the events which followed including the latest summit in Tripoli, Libya to coordinate Arab stands for the initiative of the Mediterranean Union, all indicate that most Arabs are beginning to believe that they are the only ones who can address their problems, and who can make an impact on regional and international platforms if they coordinate their efforts together. Hence, they may, in the near future, direct the questions they used to address to the US and Israel about what is happening to their fellow Arab men and women in Iraq and Palestine and Lebanon and Sudan and Somalia to themselves. They may not blame other powers for the killings and the humiliations to which Arabs are subjected, but may blame only themselves. Once they clearly reach and acknowledge this conclusion, they would be working for the dawn of a much brighter future for the region at large. This is neither an easy nor a mean task but it is also not an impossible one. The Arabs are not as weak as the propaganda against them tries to show through injecting them with concepts of frustration and hopelessness, and their adversaries are not as strong as they are portrayed, because they are the aggressors and the occupiers and we all know that the final destiny of aggressors and occupiers is defeat. We live at a time in which George Monbiot writes in the British Guardian: “War criminals must fear punishment. That’s why I went for John Bolton”, and in which Desmond Tutu from South Africa shakes the world with unraveling the horrors that Israel is perpetrating against the Palestinians, and in which the Los Angeles Times breaks the news of Israel’s racist treatment of Palestinian students. So, what the Arabs are waiting for and they are the ones who have a just cause and inalienable rights in their lands and holy places. Most people in the world are now disillusioned with the American propaganda and performance, and if the Arabs decide to take a real lead regarding the crucial issues concerning their rights, they will find many people in the world volunteering to support them. To give just one example of an event that I have personally experienced lately in Greece.

I was invited by the Foreign Minister of Greece, Mrs. Dora Bakoyannis, to a meeting of Women Leaders Workshop; an initiative that was launched few years ago in the presence of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. The American delegate who is a senior advisor for Rice started the session with a long demo of how good the US is to women all over the world, conspicuously ignoring the MENA region which is the main focus of the meeting. Once she finished, most Arab delegates spoke and there were about 12 of us and we all pointed out that foreign occupation is the most critical problem that breeds poverty, humiliation and disease for women, and that putting an end to foreign occupation is the most valuable assistance that we can give to women all over the world. We changed the focus from the kind of charity and the few dollars the American delegate was speaking about to the fact that Israeli and American occupation of Arab countries in the MENA region create the greatest impediments in the way of women welfare and emancipation. Ministers and representatives of other countries supported us directly and indirectly and we ended up by making the real issues from which Arab women suffer the focus of attention. How could the American delegate defeat us and she has no clue about the lives of women in our region? However, she would have defeated us if we were either absent or silent. The Arabs have the right to believe that through coordinating their efforts, and through their strong and strategic presence, at every fora they can change the face of the future for themselves and for future generations, and they can make their voice and their say a very important dynamic not only in their region but on the international arena where their voice and impact are currently absent.

Dr. Bouthaina Shaaban

Dr. Bouthaina Shaaban

Prof. Bouthaina Shaaban is political and media advisor to the Syrian presidency, and the former minister of Expatriates. She is also a writer, and has been a professor at Damascus University since 1985. She received her PhD in English Literature from Warwick University, London. She was the spokesperson for Syria. She was nominated for Nobel Peace Prize in 2005.

More Posts