Middle-east Arab News Opinion | Asharq Al-awsat

British Diplomat: "Security Council Cannot Impose International Forces on Sudan." - ASHARQ AL-AWSAT English Archive
Select Page

London, Asharq Al-Awsat- A high-ranking British diplomat acknowledged yesterday that if Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir continues to refuse the deployment of UN forces in Darfur then the UN Security Council (UNSC) cannot force him to do so “or occupy Sudan.” He added that the “international community must in this case shoulder the responsibility and assist the African Union (AU) to broaden the mission of its forces there.”

The diplomat, who spoke to Asharq al-Awsat on the condition of anonymity, stressed that “the Sudanese Government is responsible for the deterioration in Darfur and the UN cannot be held responsible for that.” But in his answer to a question on whether this means taking measures against the Sudanese Government for its refusal to deploy international forces, the diplomat stated, “In this case, the international community will be compelled to shoulder its responsibilities and assist the AU to broaden its mission.”

Speaking at a meeting with a group of Arab and Iranian correspondents yesterday, the British diplomat also affirmed that “The AU has done a good job but the challenge is greater than what its forces can control.” He recalled that the AU has not been asked for a military operation of this size since its establishment and added, In addition to the international forces’ expertise in this matter, the UN Security Council (UNSC) is seeking to deploy UN forces that do not require a special budget but rather (finance it) from the budget allocated for the UN peacekeeping operations. He added that the UNSC is trying to persuade the Sudanese president to accept the international forces before 24 November, the date for the AU’s meeting to discuss a renewal of its forces’ mission in Sudan. He noted British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s willingness to attend a “meeting of leaders to discuss this issue.”

Regarding the issue of Iran the source stressed that the only available means for persuading Iran to comply with the UNSC resolution on its nuclear program is the imposition of sanctions and not force, and that “Sanctions are the only proposed option.”

He added that Britain and France have submitted to the UNSC a new draft resolution under Article 41 of the UN Charter that lists the sanctions on Iran because of its refusal to give up uranium enrichment. He refused to assume that there is a split in the UNSC toward Iran and said, “The UNSC member states approved Resolution 1696 which binds Iran to give up uranium enrichment. We will approve a new resolution to impose sanctions. We will stop the action at the UN if Iran agrees to negotiate.”

Regarding Palestine, he said that his country backs any demand for a UN session to discuss the situation there and admitted that UNSC Resolution 242 that binds Israel to withdraw from the Palestinian territories after the 1967 war has not been implemented so far “for political reasons, including the neighboring countries’ policy.”

Asharq Al-Awsat

Asharq Al-Awsat

Asharq Al-Awsat is the world’s premier pan-Arab daily newspaper, printed simultaneously each day on four continents in 14 cities. Launched in London in 1978, Asharq Al-Awsat has established itself as the decisive publication on pan-Arab and international affairs, offering its readers in-depth analysis and exclusive editorials, as well as the most comprehensive coverage of the entire Arab world.

More Posts

Follow Me:
FacebookGoogle PlusYouTube