Requests to Debrief Netanyahu for Missing Chance to Get Smart Bombs

Tel Aviv- Although the Israeli people dislike former Prime Minister Ehud Barak, his latest statements against PM Benjamin Netanyahu are going viral. Some officials are requesting to debrief the premier after being accused of missing a great chance to get a first of its kind U.S. financial and qualitative military support.

According to Barak, Israel would receive USD35 billion in aid instead of USD45 billion because of Netanyahu’s poor relationship with U.S. President Barack Obama.

Barak held Netanyahu responsible for depriving Israel from a qualitative weapon, which he refused to give more details about it. Military sources said that Barak was hinting to smart bombs.

Retired military sources in Tel Aviv said that these bombs are the qualitative weapons Israel needs to attack and destroy Iran’s nuclear reactors. However, the U.S. has so far not accepted to pass them to any country, not even its NATO allies.

Sources added that the Pentagon was willing to put these weapons in a nearby base in the Middle East to make them available for Israel in case it was attacked by Iran. The only condition for this deal to be sealed was that Netanyahu stopped objecting to the nuclear agreement that was signed between the West and Iran. But the prime minister wasted this chance.

According to sources, that’s what Barak meant when he said Netanyahu preferred his friends’ interests in U.S. over Israeli security interests.

Senior U.S. officials said that Israel demanded smart bombs and the U.S. was considering several strategies to transfer them to it. Had this step occurred, it would have represented a qualitative leap in Israeli technological potentials.

Netanyahu has rejected to respond to these accusations. One of his advisors was quoted as saying that Barak, who withdrew humiliated from Lebanon, has no right to talk about protecting Israeli security interests.

Peres: Agreement over 1967 Borders, Only Final Touches Left

Tel Aviv- Israel’s former President Shimon Peres has announced that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu approved to settle the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on a two-state solution.

Peres, 93, called in Jaffa for the prompt resumption of the negotiations that have led to an agreement over the borders that existed before the 1967 war.

He said: “The two sides have agreed over the majority of issues and only final touches remain … The current situation is unacceptable; both parties should act to complete the mission, mainly the border issue.”

“The Arab Peace Initiative fits as a solid foundation for these negotiations since it hints to a possibility of achieving regional and comprehensive peace after resolving the Palestinian case,” he said. “Yet, amendments could be made upon the request of Palestinians and Israelis.”

During the inauguration of an institution for technology sciences in Jaffa, Peres said that the world’s nations can no longer endure wars and bloodshed.

He added, “While leaders are busy talking about the past and fighting to occupy territories, new generations who prefer sciences and progress over war and destruction are emerging. These generations are more concentrated on the future rather than the past; hence they call for peace and sciences.”

Peres said that all Israeli prime ministers since 1992 have endorsed the two-state solution. They are: Yitzhak Rabin, Ariel Sharon, Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert.

“Withdrawing from Gaza was a missed chance by Palestinians to transform Gaza into a launching point for an independent Palestinian state,” said Peres as he expressed his confidence in Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas who has proven his sincere intentions to reach a peace agreement.

The former president criticized the media in Israel for not informing the public of the positive updates in the Arab World. “There are 400 million people in the Arab World, 60 percent of them are less than 25 years old. Fifty to sixty thousand of them believe in aggression, terrorism and hatred; however the rest of youths believe in life, sciences and progress.”

“Why does the media focus on the aggressive minority and overlook the majority which calls for peace?” he questioned.