Middle-east Arab News Opinion | Asharq Al-awsat

Maqdesi…Possibilities of Convergence between ISIS, Nusra | ASHARQ AL-AWSAT English Archive 2005 -2017
Select Page
Media ID: 55353067

Members of the Nusra Front walk along a street in the
northwestern city of Ariha in Idlib province [Reuters]

While “Nusra Front” from al-Qaeda and some other factions are fighting ISIS near Manbij, ISIS’s has lost the control over it on 6 June facing a Kurdish militia supported by Washington. The latest developments raised arguments on a possible converge and coordination between ISIS and Qaeda represented by the Nusra Front and other factions.

In March, the radical extremist Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi has addressed a letter that reflected a change in his old stance from ISIS, by refusing the international coalition’s fighting against ISIS, and rejecting the approval of some armed faction on this fighting.

In fact, the theoretical approach and the referential similarity between ISIS and Qaeda really exists. The field convergence is always possible, whether before the break up between the both parties in May 2013 of after it.

Some will consider this approach or possible unity –which is farfetched till this day – a major disaster for USA and its allies in Syria and Iraq. Bruce Hoffman, from Georgetown University expected this convergence to happen in 2021. Others see that Maqdisi’s letter is no more than an attempt to lighten the tonality against ISIS, and a reconciliation offer, considering the similarity between both parties’ ideologies, references and mutual interests.

In his last letter, we can say that Maqdisi launched its first convergence attempt in theoretical and religious fields by approaching between theoreticians of radical extremism and ISIS. In one of his tweets in December 2015, Maqdisi announced that he is ready to change his stance from ISIS, if this latter changed views on the parties that disagree with it and stopped describing them as apostates.

Some observers saw that in his latest letter, Maqdisi has really changed views and overtook the surrounding angry calls for a more restricted position to reform ISIS before any reconciliation.

In the introduction of the letter, the extremist leader announced his refusal for any lining up with the forces of the coalition, the Turkish army, or others against ISIS. He attacked the Free Syrian Army for supporting and guiding the International Coalition forces in finding the ISIS sites, and for calling these parties to provide them with arms to combat the state.
In his letter, Maqdesi has stressed on three issues:

First: he refused the eradication of ISIS based on many religious hadiths and fatwas from their references.

Second: he stressed on the possibility of their reform and that ISIS is an Islamic organization that should not be fought in coordination with non-Muslim parties.

In his new study, Maqdesi didn’t set new constants. He refused from the beginning the attacks of the International Coalition in Syria since they kicked off in September 2014. In their official position, Nusra Front and Qaeda rejected all coordination and cooperation in any war against ISIS.

These abovementioned developments represent a transitional bypass to Maqdesi’s angry reactions that followed Abu Khaled al-Souri in March 2013, when he also described ISIS as kharijites for burning the Jordanian pilot martyr Muath al-Kasasbeh in February 2015.

We also see that Maqdesi launched a wrapped call to reconcile ISIS saying that some of the organizations members who refuse their kharijite leaders are a chance toward reform, aiming at maintaining a link with ISIS.

However, as part of his approach, based on attack and criticism, Maqdisi followed his study by a short statement published on the 4th of April, in which he said that he didn’t change his position from ISIS.
While ISIS members and leaders have always ignored Maqdesi’s speeches, this latter’s alteration is a strategic step to breach the organization. Yet, this step will not have sufficient impact to scatter the hostility between both groups, in line with a recent video for al-Zawahiri in which he attacked ISIS and described them as Kharijites.

Hence, we repeat that Maqdesi’s position is not new but a clarifying one. His position from the attacks of the international coalition against the ISIS is the same, but he also didn’t change his description for ISIS as Kharijites.