Middle-east Arab News Opinion | Asharq Al-awsat

Sperm Count Declining in Developed World | ASHARQ AL-AWSAT English Archive 2005 -2017
Select Page
Media ID: 55379710

Photo illustration of Cryos, the biggest sperm bank worldwide, in Aarhus, Denmark, on December 15, 2016. HENNING BAGGER/AFP/Getty

Sperm count among men in North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand has dropped by more than 50 percent in 40 years, according to research warning of fertility risk, though outside experts urged caution about the results.

A review of data collected from nearly 43,000 men in 185 previous studies from 1973 to 2011, found a “significant decline” in sperm concentration, according to the research.

The decline was 52.4 percent — from 99 million to 47 million sperm per milliliter of semen, said the authors, who published their findings in the journal Human Reproduction Update.

This was still above the range considered “normal” by the World Health Organization — between 15 million and 200 million sperm per milliliter. Even a concentration under 15 million does not automatically mean infertility.

The research team found no significant decline in South America, Asia, and Africa, where fewer studies had been conducted.

Apart from fertility risks, reduced sperm count could be an indicator of underlying health problems caused by environmental factors such as pesticide poisoning, or stress, smoking, a poor diet and other lifestyle factors.

“This study is an urgent wake-up call for researchers and health authorities around the world to investigate the causes of the sharp ongoing drop in sperm count,” said Hagai Levine, who co-led the work at the Hebrew University-Hadassah Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine in Jerusalem.

But the topic is a controversial one, as numerous studies in the past have contradicted one another — some showing a sperm count decline, and others not.

The latest work seeks to address some potentially confounding factors. 

It excluded data from men recruited for studies because of fertility problems, and used only studies in which sperm concentration was measured with a hi-tech tool called a haemocytometer.

This sidesteps the problem of comparing samples measured with incomparable technologies — older tests tended to overestimate sperm count. 

The work had other limitations, according to male fertility expert Martin Blomberg Jensen of Denmark’s Righospitalet. 

It compared samples from different individuals from different countries and laboratories. The best way to confirm changes in sperm count would be through long-term surveillance, known as a prospective cohort study, of a group of healthy males.

The latest figures were not backed by the findings of one such study, conducted from 1996 to 2010, in Denmark, said Blomberg Jensen.

The new work contributed useful data, added Allan Pacey of the University of Sheffield, but “the debate has not yet been resolved and there is clearly much work still to be done.”