Middle-east Arab News Opinion | Asharq Al-awsat

Opinion: Iran, Where Poetry is a National Crime | ASHARQ AL-AWSAT English Archive 2005 -2017
Select Page
Media ID: 55345601
Caption:

An Iranian clergyman speaks to a woman at his stall in Tehran’s 26th International Book Fair, at the Imam Khomeini grand mosque, in Tehran, Iran, Wednesday, May 1, 2013.(AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)


Does a seminar on reforming the meter and rhyme schemes of Persian poetry violate “Islamic values” and threaten the foundations of the Islamic Republic in Iran? That is the view of the Islamic Court in Tehran which last month sentenced two poets to 9 and 11 years in prison respectively plus 99 lashes of the cane for each in public.

One of the two, Mrs. Fatemeh Ekhtesari, sentenced to 11 and a half years, was found guilty of “undermining the security of the Islamic state” by composing and reciting in public a number of “poems full of ambiguity and capable of being read in deviant and dangerous ways.”

Ekhtesari is a surrealist poet whose verse could, and indeed is intended to be read in many different ways. One of her diwans (collections of verse), for example, is called “Crying on the Shoulder of An Egg”. Another comes under the title “A Feminist Discourse Before Baking Potatoes.”

Feminism is a strong theme with Ekhtesari who insists that since God created both men and women presumably from the same “red mud” mentioned in the Koran, there is no reason to prevent the latter from enjoying any freedoms available to the former.

The Tehran Islamic Prosecutor, however, insisted that Ekhtesari’s “ambiguous poems” were meant to pass “dangerous political messages that could encourage people to distance themselves from the True Faith.”
“She writes something but means something else,” the Prosecutor claimed. “Her trick is to avoid saying anything in a straightforward way, creating space for all manner of dangerous thinking.”

The Islamic Prosecutor based part of his case on the claim that what matters in Islam is “zikr” that is to say constant remembrance of God by repeating, if necessary in silence and to oneself, the formula “There is no God but Allah”. Those who abandon “zikr” for its opposite, which is “fikr”, that is to say thinking, move away from the Path of Faith.

The irony in all this is that Ekhtesari is not a political poet. In fact, she has written that those who try to use poetry to advance political ideals betray both. As editor of the monthly literary magazine “Only One Tomorrow”, Ekhtesari offered space to writers and poets across ideological spectrum, including some Khomeinists.

However, as a poet she cannot be but affected by the ambient social and political order in her homeland. She cannot turn her face the other way when she sees ugliness, oppression and terror, themes that force their way into some of her poems.

Ekhtesari is also an original theoretician of poetic modes. Her collection of essays entitled “Linguistic Tricks in Postmodern Sonnet” is both intriguing and instructive.

Ekhtesari’s fellow convict-cum-poet is Mehdi Mussawi who has received a six-year sentence. Mussawi is the founder and principal animator of a poetry workshop in Tehran where Ekhtesari has often spoken and recited her poems. The workshop is supposedly dedicated to developing a new form which Mussawi calls “postmodern ghazal.”

The argument is that, having experimented with modern forms including European-style prose-poetry for almost a century, Persian poets need to return to traditional forms, albeit with radical changes to reflect modern realities.

Mussawi rejects the argument of older generation poets such as Ahmad Shamlou who claimed that the traditional ghazal is so beholden to the musicality of its meter and rhyme schemes that it cannot relay any meaning in a powerful way.

According to Mussawi, once the Persian poet has learned to play with the traditional rules, he could invent virtually countless meters and rhymes capable of expressing any sentiment.

The Islamic court, however, has charged Mussawi with propagating “immoral images” in his poetry and thus “insulting sacred values of the faithful community.”

Equally painful is the Islamic Court’s decision to impose a blanket ban on the publication and recital of any poems by Ekhtesari and Mussawi. Under an edict issued by the Islamic Guidance Ministry in 2003, people in that position become “non-persons”, even their names and pictures are banned.
Both Ekhtesari and Mussawi spent several months in prison two years ago but were released after the prosecutor failed to prove any political crime. This is why this time, the prosecutor focused on a claim that the poets had attacked “sacred tenets of faith”.

The sentencing was made easier thanks to a recent lecture by “Supreme Guide” Ayatollah Ali Khamenei laying down the rules of what he believes “good Islamic poets” should do when writing poetry.

However, as exiled poet Yadallah Roya’i once noted, one could write an advertising text or a police report on order, but not poetry. “Even the poet cannot order himself to write poetry,” Roya’i noted.” The poet is like a tree, shedding its leaves and flowers so that there is room for future leaves and flowers.”

Iran is one of the few countries in the world where poetry has always been regarded as the highest form of literary creation. Iranian cities, streets and parks were more often named after poets than conquerors or empire-builders. If an Iranian home has at least one book it is likely to be a collection of poems.

And, yet, with the seizure of power by mullahs in 1979, Iran has experienced one of the most dangerous phases in its long history as far as poets and intellectuals in general are concerned.

The irony is that both the founder of the regime, the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and his successor as “Supreme Guide” Ayatollah Ali Khamenei cast themselves as amateur poets. Khomeini banned publication of his diwans while he was allowed, believing that appearing as a poet might soften the dour persona he was building as leader of a revolution that could execute 4000 people on a weekend. After his death, however, hundreds of his poems, most of the traditional-style sonnets (ghazals) have been printed by the foundation bearing his name. Khamenei does not publish his poems but organizes private readings with a few dozen “appreciators” once or twice a year.

Ekhtesari and Mussawi have been sent to jail, not killed. Others haven’t been that lucky. Hashem Shaabani was hanged on the eve of President Rouhani’s visit to Ahvaz in 2014.

Shaabani was not the first Iranian poet to be murdered by the mullahs. The left-wing poet Sa’id Sultanpur was abducted on the day of his wedding on Khomeini’s orders and shot dead in a Tehran prison. Rahman Hatefi, writing under the pen-name of Heydar Mehregan, had his veins cut and was left to bleed to death in the Evin prison.

Under President Hashemi Rafsanjani, a plan to kill a busload of Iranian poets on their way to a festival in Armenia failed at the last minute. Nevertheless, Rafsanjani succeeded in eliminating more than a dozen writers and poets. The worst spate of killings happened under President Khatami when more than 80 intellectuals including the poets Mohammad Mokhtari and Mohammad-Ja’far Pouyandeh were murdered by government agents.

Let’s give the final word to Mussawi: “I hope to see the day when no one is sent to jail in this land for writing poems.” Inshallah!